By Murray Gottheil | June 24, 2025
There is no shortage of talk about the importance of lawyers delegating legal work to other lawyers and paralegals. Despite that, I have always believed that lawyers should not delegate work that they do not know how to do themselves. I questioned how anyone can check the quality of work done by their law clerks or associates if they do not know what a good job looks like.
Of course, you also have to make sure that the people to whom you delegate know what they are doing.
So, first I learned how to do things, then I taught other people how to do them, and finally I delegated to them.
Then, along comes A.I. Let’s suppose that senior lawyers start delegating as much as possible to A.I. and spend less time teaching young folks how to do things. In a few years, we will have a generation of lawyers who are relying upon AI to do things that they do not know how to do themselves.
Does it matter?
I suppose that it will not matter at all if the AI is perfect. But what if it is not?
Imagine a day when you are being transported in an autonomous vehicle. The vehicle has manual controls which are never used. The A.I. makes a mistake and you are about to crash into an oncoming truck. You grab the wheel. If you are of my generation and know how to drive, you might succeed in avoiding a collision. But if you are from a future generation and were never taught to drive, perhaps you will be crushed.
What if legal AI is not that good? What if it omits a crucial clause from an agreement and, never having drafted that type of agreement from scratch, you do not notice its absence? That would be bad.
For the sake of discussion, let me suspend disbelief and assume that AI will be perfect, and that the practice of teaching young lawyers to draft documents can be safely relegated to the dustbin of history. I am still concerned for those lawyers who will not be trained to do this stuff.
One of the things that made me a successful lawyer was my ability to draw upon my experience thoughtfully drafting thousands of documents. So, when I went into a meeting to discuss legal relationships, I could conceive how legal concepts fit together – a skill that, to a large extent, I developed thinking about how to blend them in a document. I cannot imagine that I would have had the same depth of understanding if all of my documents had been spat from a machine without my having been deeply engaged in their production. And as for those people whom I mentored and trained, and to whom I explained what was good and bad about their drafting, and sent them back to try again, that is how they learned their craft.
I fear that A.I. will represent “Abandoned Intelligence”. To quote Miranda Lambert and Carrie Underwood: “[I]… got a real good feelin’ somethin’ bad about to happen.”
Murray is a happily retired lawyer who lives in the country, drives a pick-up truck, writes, teaches and mentors. You can reach him at murray@murraygottheil.com or see what he is up to at lawanddisorderinc.com.
RELATED ARTICLES
Lawyers can be jailed for misusing AI
AI in court: Just your humble serpent?