Decision dispels controversy about whether Gladue principles apply to trial process
By Julius Melnitzer | September 30, 2022
The Ontario Court of Appeal has ruled that trial judges may consider an accused’s Indigeneity in determining whether their criminal records are admissible in cross-examination.
“This is an important and helpful legal precedent on an issue that has never been adjudicated and an important piece – albeit just one small piece – of the much larger puzzle involved in making the criminal justice system more aware and more responsible in achieving proper reconciliation,” says Jonathan Shime, a partner with Toronto criminal and regulatory boutique Cooper, Sandler, Shime & Bergman LLP and co-counsel for the accused Dale King in R. v. King.
The OCA’s decision also dispels the controversy as to whether the Gladue principles – the Supreme Court of Canada’s guidance on factors to be taken into account when sentencing Indigenous offenders – apply to the trial process and are not limited to sentencing.
Read more here . . .
Julius Melnitzer is a Toronto-based legal affairs writer, ghostwriter, writing coach and media trainer. Readers can reach him at [email protected] or https://legalwriter.net/contact.
AltaLink ruling underscores Crown’s duty to consider Indigenous groups’ economic interests when making decisions
Bare Bones Briefs: FC dismisses murdered Indigenous women’s class action, certifies class for feds’ negligence to Indigenous in custody
Government should be honest about its support for UN Indigenous rights resolution
Why B.C.’s Indigenous rights bill is ‘impractically broad’ and inconsistent with Canadian law
Alberta bill to boost Indigenous access to investment capital